• Home
  • Blog
  • Who Can File a Wrongful Death Lawsuit in California?

Who Can File a Wrongful Death Lawsuit in California?

When someone dies because of another person’s carelessness, the family is left with grief first and legal questions much later. One of those questions catches many families off guard: who in the family actually has the right to hold the responsible person accountable?

California answers that with a statute, not with how close you were to the person who died. The right to bring a wrongful death lawsuit in California belongs to a specific list of people in Code of Civil Procedure section 377.60, and that list is built largely on the state’s inheritance rules. The results can feel arbitrary. A fiancé of ten years may have no claim at all. The parents of a married adult sometimes do. Whether a stepchild can sue may come down to who paid the rent.

These questions come up far more often than anyone would like. Traffic crashes alone killed 4,061 people in California in 2023, according to the California Office of Traffic Safety, and every one of those deaths left a family trying to sort out what comes next.

Who can file a wrongful death lawsuit in California

Section 377.60 sorts the people who can sue into three groups. Someone in the first group only has to show their relationship to the person who died. The other two groups have to show more.

Group Who is in it What they have to show
Spouse, children, and heirs The spouse or registered domestic partner, the children, and the children of a child who has already died. If the person left no children or grandchildren, anyone who would inherit under California’s intestate succession rules. If the parents would qualify but have died, the person’s legal guardians. The relationship
Dependents A putative spouse, the putative spouse’s children, stepchildren, and parents They depended on the person who died financially
Minors in the household A minor who lived in the home of the person who died, related or not They lived there for the previous 180 days and got at least half of their support from the person who died

A grandchild only qualifies through a parent who has already died. If the person who died leaves a living son, the son’s children don’t have their own claim.

The legal guardian rule was added in 2020. If the parents of the person who died would have been entitled to sue but have passed away themselves, the person’s legal guardians can sue in their place. That covers, for example, a grandmother or aunt who became a child’s legal guardian after the child’s parents died.

No children: when parents and siblings can sue

The first group has a built-in switch. If the person who died left children or grandchildren, the first group is the spouse and the children. If they didn’t, the statute hands the question to intestate succession, the rules that decide who inherits when someone dies without a will, and anyone who would inherit under those rules can sue.

This is where many families are surprised. When a married person with no children dies, California’s inheritance rules split their separate property between the surviving spouse and the parents (Probate Code section 6401). That generally puts the parents of a married adult with no kids in the first group alongside the spouse. If both parents have already died, brothers and sisters take the parents’ place in that split, and they can generally sue alongside the spouse.

Parents actually have two possible routes. They can qualify as heirs under these inheritance rules, or, whether or not they are heirs, they can qualify by showing they were financially dependent on their child.

If the person who died left Who can usually sue as spouse, child, or heir
Children (with or without a spouse) The spouse or domestic partner and the children. Parents can sue only if they were financially dependent.
A spouse but no children The spouse and the parents. If neither parent is alive, the spouse and the brothers and sisters.
No spouse and no children The parents. If neither parent is alive, the brothers and sisters, and then more distant relatives in the order set by the inheritance rules.

Grandparents inherit, and so can sue as heirs, only if the person who died left no spouse, no children, no parents, and no brothers or sisters or their children.

Who counts as an heir can get technical. The answer comes from Probate Code sections 6401 and 6402 applied to your specific family, and a mix of community and separate property, a blended family, or a sibling who died earlier can all change it. It is worth having a lawyer map out the family tree early, before anyone files anything.

Relatives who have to prove they were dependent

Some family members can sue only if they relied on the person who died financially. The statute lists a putative spouse (someone whose marriage turned out to be legally invalid but who believed in good faith that it was valid), that spouse’s children, stepchildren, and parents. Parents usually land in this group when the person who died left children of their own, which takes the parents out of the first group.

Courts define dependence as relying on the person who died, at least to some extent, for the necessaries of life, meaning things like housing, food, clothing, and medical care (Hazelwood v. Hazelwood (1976) 57 Cal.App.3d 693). It doesn’t have to be total. In Chavez v. Carpenter (2001) 91 Cal.App.4th 1433, a 24-year-old man killed by a drunk driver was unmarried but had a young daughter, so his parents were not his heirs. He lived with his parents and contributed money and help to the household, and the Court of Appeal held there was enough evidence for the question of whether they depended on him to go to trial.

Whether particular help meets that standard depends on the evidence. Help with rent, groceries, or medical bills makes the strongest case, and money that only paid for extras is harder to fit within a test about necessities. Records matter: rent payments, bills the person covered, regular bank transfers.

Stepchildren have their own history here. In 1974, the California Supreme Court held that a stepdaughter who was never formally adopted was not an heir and could not sue for her stepfather’s death. The Legislature responded the next year by letting dependent stepchildren sue. A stepchild who was legally adopted is simply a child and belongs in the first group.

Situations that surprise families

Unmarried partners and fiancés

A partner who wasn’t married to the person who died, and wasn’t a registered domestic partner, generally can’t bring a wrongful death claim, no matter how long the relationship lasted. The narrow exception is a putative spouse, which requires a good-faith belief that the two of you were actually married. The partner’s own children may still have a claim, though, if they were minors who lived in the home for the previous 180 days and got at least half of their support from the person who died.

Separated or divorced spouses

A spouse who was separated but not yet divorced is still a spouse in the eyes of the law. Once a divorce is final, a former spouse is not on the statute’s list, even one who was still receiving support. The children of that marriage keep their own claims.

A child the parent never acknowledged

Children born outside marriage have the same rights as any other child once the parent-child relationship is legally established. The trouble comes when it wasn’t. In Stennett v. Miller (2019) 34 Cal.App.5th 284, DNA showed a girl was the biological daughter of the man who died, but he had never openly treated her as his own and no court had declared him her father while he was alive. The Court of Appeal held she could not sue, because standing turns on the right to inherit and she had none. Under Probate Code section 6453, she needed a court order during his lifetime, clear and convincing evidence that he openly treated her as his own, or proof that it was impossible for him to do so along with clear and convincing evidence of parentage.

Adopted children

A legally adopted child has the same rights as a biological child. A child adopted by another family generally loses the legal tie to the birth parent. Under Probate Code section 6451, there is an exception when the child had lived with the birth parent and the adoption was by a stepparent or happened after a birth parent died. In that situation, the child can still inherit from the birth parent and may be able to sue for that parent’s death.

A child born after the death

A child who was conceived before the parent died but born afterward inherits as if born during the parent’s lifetime (Probate Code section 6407), and has the same right to sue as the other children.

A parent who abandoned the child

Under Probate Code section 6452, a parent does not inherit from a child if the parent’s rights were terminated and never restored, if the parent never acknowledged the child, or if the parent left the child for at least seven straight years during childhood, without supporting or communicating with them, intending to abandon them. The statute says a parent who can’t inherit is treated as if they died before the child, so the inheritance passes to the next relatives in line. Because standing as an heir depends on the right to inherit, that parent has no wrongful death claim as an heir.

The death of an unborn child

This is one of the hardest answers in California law. In Justus v. Atchison (1977) 19 Cal.3d 564, the California Supreme Court held that a fetus is not a “person” under the wrongful death statute, so parents cannot bring a wrongful death claim for a stillbirth. That remains the rule today.

Immigration status and family outside the country

Immigration status doesn’t take away the right to sue. Under Evidence Code section 351.2, a person’s immigration status is not admissible in a personal injury or wrongful death case, and the other side generally can’t ask about it in discovery. The statute also doesn’t require family members to live in California or in the United States.

What about a will?

A will or trust does not change who can bring a wrongful death claim. The claim belongs to the family members on the statute’s list, not to the estate, and the money recovered doesn’t pass through the will. Family members also don’t need to open a probate case to file a wrongful death lawsuit.

One family, one lawsuit

Each eligible family member has their own claim, but California generally requires all of them to be brought together in a single lawsuit. In Cross v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. (1964) 60 Cal.2d 690, the California Supreme Court explained that each heir has a personal and separate claim, but all of them should join or be joined in one action.

That has real consequences for families who don’t get along. A relative who won’t join as a plaintiff can be named as a defendant, but naming them isn’t enough. They have to be properly served. In Ruttenberg v. Ruttenberg (1997) 53 Cal.App.4th 801, a daughter was named in her father’s wrongful death case but never served, and the rest of the family settled without her. The court held she could sue the family members who left her out.

What a left-out relative can do depends partly on whether the defendant knew about them. When the defendant settled without knowing that relative existed, the relative generally can’t go after the defendant, and their claim is against the family members who settled without them (Smith v. Premier Alliance Ins. Co. (1995) 41 Cal.App.4th 691). When the defendant did know, the answer can be different. The practical lesson is to identify everyone who might have a claim at the start, including an estranged sibling or a child from an earlier relationship.

How the money is divided

Wrongful death money is not divided by inheritance shares. Each family member recovers for their own loss, and a spouse who depended on the person every day may have a very different loss than an adult child who lived across the country. The statute directs the court to determine each person’s rights in an award, so if the family can’t agree on how to split a settlement or award, the court decides (Code of Civil Procedure section 377.61). The California Supreme Court confirmed in Corder v. Corder (2007) 41 Cal.4th 644 that the split is based on each person’s own damages. When a minor is entitled to part of the money, the court generally has to approve that portion and make sure it is protected for the child.

Wrongful death claims and survival claims

Families often hear both terms, and they are two different claims that usually travel together.

A wrongful death claim is the family’s own claim for what they lost: the person’s financial support, their help around the house, and their love and companionship. A survival claim is the claim the person who died would have had if they had lived. It is brought by the personal representative of the estate or, if no estate is opened, by a successor in interest who files a sworn declaration with the court (Code of Civil Procedure sections 377.30 and 377.32). It covers what the person lost before death, like medical bills and lost wages between the injury and the death, and it can include punitive damages.

For a few years, a survival claim could also recover the person’s own pain and suffering before death. That temporary rule applied only to cases filed from January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2025, plus certain older cases that had been given trial priority. It expired, and a bill to extend it never passed. Under Code of Civil Procedure section 377.34, survival claims filed on or after January 1, 2026 cannot recover damages for the person’s pain, suffering, or disfigurement. The family’s wrongful death claim is not affected by that change. We explain how the two claims fit together after a fatal crash in our guide to pedestrian accidents in California.

What the family can recover

Under California’s jury instruction for wrongful death, CACI 3921, the family can recover the financial support the person would have provided, gifts or benefits they would have given, the value of household services they would have performed, and reasonable funeral and burial expenses. The family can also recover for the loss of the person’s love, companionship, comfort, care, assistance, protection, affection, society, and moral support, and children can recover for the loss of a parent’s training and guidance.

The same instruction tells jurors not to award money for the family’s grief, sorrow, or mental anguish. The law compensates for the relationship that was taken, not for the mourning itself. That line can feel cold, but it shapes how these cases are proven. The evidence is about who the person was in each family member’s life.

A few other rules can change the picture:

  • Punitive damages are generally not available in a wrongful death claim. The exception, under Civil Code section 3294(d), is a death caused by a homicide for which the defendant was convicted of a felony. Otherwise, punitive damages can be pursued only through the survival claim, and only where the person who died could have recovered them.
  • The fault of the person who died counts. California’s pure comparative negligence rule comes from Li v. Yellow Cab Co. (1975) 13 Cal.3d 804, and in a wrongful death case it reduces the family’s recovery by the share of fault assigned to the person who died (Horwich v. Superior Court (1999) 21 Cal.4th 272; CACI 407). If a jury finds the person who died 20 percent responsible, the family’s award is reduced by 20 percent.
  • An uninsured driver’s family can still recover. Proposition 213 limits what uninsured drivers can recover for their own injuries, but the California Supreme Court held in Horwich v. Superior Court (1999) 21 Cal.4th 272 that it does not bar a wrongful death claim by the family of an uninsured driver who was killed. Our guide to being hit by an uninsured driver in California covers Proposition 213 in more detail.
  • Medical malpractice deaths are capped. When a health care provider’s negligence causes a death, California’s MICRA law (Civil Code section 3333.2) caps the non-economic damages. For wrongful death, the cap is $650,000 in 2026, and it rises each year.

Deadlines for a wrongful death claim

Situation Deadline Source
Most wrongful death claims 2 years from the date of death CCP 335.1
The claim is against a government agency or public employee Written claim to the agency within 6 months after the claim accrues, usually the date of death. If that’s missed, an application to the agency to present a late claim within a reasonable time, and no later than 1 year. If the agency denies it, a petition to the court within 6 months. Gov. Code 911.2, 911.4, 946.6
Death caused by medical malpractice 1 year from when the family discovered, or should have discovered, the death and its cause, and generally no more than 3 years from the death CCP 340.5; Larcher v. Wanless (1976) 18 Cal.3d 646
The person responsible is convicted of a felony for the death 1 year after judgment is pronounced in the criminal case, unless another deadline gives more time. For certain serious felonies listed in the statute, such as murder, up to 10 years after the defendant is discharged from parole. CCP 340.3

The two-year clock in Code of Civil Procedure section 335.1 usually starts on the date of death, not the date of the crash or injury. In some cases the start can be delayed, but the California Supreme Court held in Norgart v. Upjohn Co. (1999) 21 Cal.4th 383 that it is delayed only until the family suspects, or should suspect, that someone’s wrongdoing caused the death. Suspecting anyone at all starts the clock, even before the family knows exactly who was responsible.

The government deadline is the easiest one to miss. If the family has a claim against a public entity or public employee, such as a city whose bus was involved or a county responsible for a dangerous road, a written claim under Government Code section 911.2 generally must be presented within six months after the claim accrues, which for a wrongful death claim is usually the date of death. Missing it isn’t always fatal, because the law allows an application to present a late claim, but that relief is limited, it has its own deadline of no more than a year, and it doesn’t preserve the lawsuit unless it’s granted or a court later grants relief.

Children get extra time in some situations. In Cross, the California Supreme Court held that a minor child’s wrongful death claim was not barred even though the surviving spouse’s claim had expired, because the child’s deadline was paused until adulthood. That pause comes from Code of Civil Procedure section 352, which still applies today. It does not stop the six-month government claim deadline (J.M. v. Huntington Beach Union High School Dist. (2017)). Being a minor can still be grounds for an agency to accept a late claim, but the late application generally has to be filed within that one-year window. Our guide to the California statute of limitations for car accidents walks through these deadlines in more detail.

What to do in the first few weeks

  • Don’t sign anything from an insurance company or give a recorded statement about the death before talking to a lawyer.
  • Figure out who might have a claim, including relatives the family isn’t close to, so no one is left out of the lawsuit.
  • Gather the documents that prove relationships: the death certificate, marriage certificate or domestic partnership registration, and birth or adoption records.
  • If anyone was financially dependent, collect proof of the support, like rent receipts, bank transfers, and bills the person paid.
  • Write down the six-month date now if a government vehicle, employee, or road could be involved.
  • Preserve the evidence. Crash data, video, and company records can disappear within months. After a fatal crash with a commercial vehicle, our guide on what to do after a truck accident in California explains what to preserve, and if the driver fled, see our guide to hit and run in California.

Frequently asked questions

Who has the right to file a wrongful death lawsuit in California?

The spouse or registered domestic partner, the children, and the children of a child who has died. If there are no children or grandchildren, whoever would inherit under California’s intestate succession rules can sue, which often means parents or siblings. Putative spouses, stepchildren, and parents can also sue if they were financially dependent, and so can a minor who lived in the home for 180 days and got at least half of their support from the person who died.

Can a girlfriend or boyfriend sue for wrongful death in California?

Generally no. Unmarried partners and fiancés aren’t on the statute’s list unless they were registered domestic partners or qualify as a putative spouse, which requires a good-faith belief that the two were legally married. The partner’s minor children may still have a claim if they lived in the household and depended on the person who died.

Can parents sue for the wrongful death of a married adult child?

Often, yes, if the adult child had no children. California’s inheritance rules split a married person’s separate property between the spouse and the parents when there are no children, so the parents generally qualify alongside the spouse. If the adult child did have children, the parents can sue only if they were financially dependent on their child.

Can stepchildren file a wrongful death lawsuit in California?

Yes, if they were financially dependent on the stepparent who died. A stepchild who was legally adopted is treated as a child and doesn’t have to prove dependence. A minor stepchild who lived in the home for 180 days and got at least half of their support from the stepparent also qualifies.

Can siblings sue for wrongful death in California?

Sometimes. Brothers and sisters can sue as heirs when the person who died left no children and no living parents. That’s generally true even if there is a surviving spouse, because siblings share in the separate property in that situation.

How is a wrongful death settlement divided among family members?

By each person’s own loss, not by inheritance shares. Families often agree on the split themselves. If they can’t, the judge decides based on what each family member lost. A minor’s share generally needs court approval.

How long do you have to file a wrongful death lawsuit in California?

Generally two years from the date of death. If the claim is against a government agency, a written claim generally must be presented within six months, usually measured from the death. Medical malpractice deaths and cases with a felony conviction follow different rules, and a minor child’s deadline may be paused until adulthood for claims against private defendants.

Can undocumented family members file a wrongful death claim in California?

Yes. Immigration status doesn’t affect the right to sue, and under Evidence Code section 351.2 it is not admissible in a wrongful death case and generally can’t be asked about in discovery. Family members who live outside the United States can also bring a claim if they are on the statute’s list.

Talk to someone before the family decides

Families usually try to answer these questions on their own first, often while planning a funeral. The answers are rarely obvious. Who can sue, who has to be included, and which deadline applies all depend on the details of the family and how the death happened.

If you lost someone in Los Angeles or anywhere in Southern California because of another person’s carelessness, Power Legal Group can help your family identify everyone who may have a claim and work out which deadlines apply. Contact us for a free consultation. Every family’s situation is different and nothing here guarantees a particular result, but getting answers early protects everyone’s options.